Go Back   The Environment Site Forums > Energy Forums > Wind Energy Forum

Notices

Wind Energy Forum "I can't change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination." - Jimmy Dean

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 24th-November-2008, 11:46 AM
Eco Nut
Points: 1,423, Level: 21 Points: 1,423, Level: 21 Points: 1,423, Level: 21
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 230
Deathridesahorse is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb New Material invented (for wind power?!?)

Design Engineer - Materials Processes

Nanocoatings reduce friction and wear
Date: 25/11/2008
When moving parts of a machine are subject to friction, more energy is required to move them, the machine does not operate as efficiently, and the parts have a tendency to wear over time.

But if parts could be manufactured with tough, 'slippery' surfaces, there would be less friction, requiring less input energy and the parts would last longer.

Researchers at the USA Department of Energy's (DOE) Ames Laboratory are collaborating with other research laboratories, universities, and industrial partners to develop just such a coating.

Bruce Cook, an Ames Laboratory scientist and co-principal investigator on the four-year, $3million project, says: "If you consider a pump, like a water pump or a hydraulic pump, it has a turbine that moves the fluid. When the rotor spins, there is friction generated at the contacting surface between the vanes and the housing, or stator. This friction translates into additional torque needed to operate the pump, particularly at start-up. In addition, the friction results in a degradation of the surfaces, which reduces efficiency and the life of the pump. It takes extra energy to get the pump started, and you cannot run it at its optimum (higher speed) efficiency because it would wear out more quickly."

Applying a coating to the blades to reduce friction and increase wear resistance could have a significant effect in boosting the efficiency of pumps, which are used in numerous industrial and commercial applications. According to Cook, government calculations show that a modest increase in pump efficiency resulting from use of these nanocoatings could reduce USA industrial energy usage by 31 trillion BTUs annually by 2030, equivalent to savings of $179million a year.

The coating Cook is investigating is a boron-aluminium-magnesium ceramic alloy he discovered with fellow Ames Laboratory researcher and Iowa State University professor of Materials Science and Engineering Alan Russell about eight years ago. Nicknamed BAM, the material exhibited exceptional hardness, and the research has expanded to include titanium-diboride alloys as well.

In many applications it is far more cost-effective to apply the wear-resistant materials as a coating than to manufacture an entire part out of the ceramic. Fortunately the BAM material is amenable to application as a hard, wear-resistant coating. Working with ISU materials scientist Alan Constant, the team is using a technique called pulsed laser deposition to deposit a thin layer of the alloy on hydraulic pump vanes and tungsten carbide cutting tools. Cook is working with Eaton Corporation, a leading manufacturer of fluid power equipment, using another, more commercial-scale technique known as magnetron sputtering to lay down a wear-resistant coating.

Pumps are not the only applications for the boride nanocoatings. The group is also working with Greenleaf Corporation, a leading industrial cutting tool maker, to put a long-lasting coating on cutting tools. If a tool cuts with reduced friction, less applied force is needed, which directly translates to a reduction in the energy required for the machining operation.

To test the coatings, the project team includes Peter J Blau and Jun Qu at one of the USA's leading friction and wear research facilities at DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory, or ORNL, in Tennessee. Initial tests show a decrease in friction relative to an uncoated surface of at least an order of magnitude with the AlMgB14-based coating. In preliminary tests, the coating also appears to outperform other coatings such as diamond-like carbon and TiB2.

The photograph shows an AlMgB14 coating on a steel substrate. The substrate is the mottled region on the left-hand side of the photo and the coating is the thin (2-3micron), darker strip running along the edge of the steel.

For more information, visit Ames Laboratory Home Page

source: Nanocoatings Reduce Friction And Wear - Materials Processes - an Design Engineer Article at Engineer Live

<<

Just wondering if this would be a good candidate for wind power or, indeed, any of the alternative renewable enrgy sources being looked at.

My first thought was that massive mag-lev turbine that seems so to be pure fiction: maybe this material, with it's super slick properties, could make such massive wind turbines possible.

(BTW, what are the limiting factors in making humungous size wind turbines?)
__________________
Attack is invisible. Awareness is no escape.

"ROAR LIKE A BOAR!"

Don't lick the earth. (Tesla???)

"I would far rather be happy than right, any day."
"And are you?"
"No. That's where it all falls down, of course." - Douglas Adams
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 24th-November-2008, 01:12 PM
Forum Royalty
Points: 14,986, Level: 79 Points: 14,986, Level: 79 Points: 14,986, Level: 79
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 4,609
Richard has a spectacular aura aboutRichard has a spectacular aura about
Default

"(BTW, what are the limiting factors in making humungous size wind turbines?)"

Some that I know of are:

1) Stress forces due to force of wind and blade movement (vibtrations etc)
2) Base has to support weight of blades and gear assembly etc
3) Speed of blade tips will become an issue with big turbines as it can approach the speed of sound (sonic boom issues)
__________________
http://www.sudsolutions.com
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 27th-November-2008, 11:07 AM
Eco Nut
Points: 1,423, Level: 21 Points: 1,423, Level: 21 Points: 1,423, Level: 21
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 230
Deathridesahorse is on a distinguished road
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
"(BTW, what are the limiting factors in making humungous size wind turbines?)"

Some that I know of are:

1) Stress forces due to force of wind and blade movement (vibtrations etc)
2) Base has to support weight of blades and gear assembly etc
3) Speed of blade tips will become an issue with big turbines as it can approach the speed of sound (sonic boom issues)
cheers!
__________________
Attack is invisible. Awareness is no escape.

"ROAR LIKE A BOAR!"

Don't lick the earth. (Tesla???)

"I would far rather be happy than right, any day."
"And are you?"
"No. That's where it all falls down, of course." - Douglas Adams
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 27th-November-2008, 11:52 AM
Windguy's Avatar
Forum Hermit
Points: 5,664, Level: 48 Points: 5,664, Level: 48 Points: 5,664, Level: 48
Activity: 39% Activity: 39% Activity: 39%
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,777
Blog Entries: 1
Windguy is a jewel in the roughWindguy is a jewel in the roughWindguy is a jewel in the rough
Default

What you've stated won't help increase the size of wind generators, but it will help with producing electricity at lower wind speeds. i.e. will run at 5m/s, now with new tech, 3m/s.

What really limits massive size wind generators is the circular momentum resistance that occurs. It increases with a faster rotation speed, increase in weight of the blades, and the length of the blades.

So to build larger wind generators, we need to lighten the blades but still maintain structural stability of them to build larger ones.

The sonic boom occurs in dry air at 20C (68F), the speed of sound is 343ms-1. This also equates to 1235km/h, 767mph, 1125 ft/s. The largest wind generators are only getting up to 300km/h. So the sonic boom is not a problem. To maintain the efficiency level of the blades, when you build larger the tips need to move faster to justify the size increase. Obviously that increases your angular momentum resistance which saps the power. So the larger the wind generator gets the greater the efficiency right up until the wind generator gets too large then that efficiency drops off like a cliff. So weight reduction is the number one priority to build larger wind generators. The second priority is to get that efficiency right across the wind speeds.

The next generation of wind generators by my prediction, would be blades that twist to gain better acceleration rates and to maintain maximum power output since the tip of each blade goes many times faster than the base of each blade the faster the wind speed, therefore you need more twist when the prop is spinning fast than if the props are spinning slowly. If you have a permanent twist in the blades than the efficiency drops at the lower wind speeds. No twist lowers maximum output potential.
__________________
Now national boundaries are not so important. The whole world is one entity, one body. That is the new reality. - Dalai Lama
http://www.theage.com.au/frontpage/2.../frontpage.pdf
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
The Environment Site