Rock Port, Missouri - The First 100% Wind Powered City

[Besoeker]

Originally Posted by LMagic007

The violation or otherwise is irrelevant, so we can move on.

OK. You can't cite a volation. Maybe that's because none exists?

[LMagic007]

Originally Posted by Besoeker

OK. You can't cite a volation. Maybe that's because none exists?

As I indicated violation or otherwise is independent of the issue of instantaneous. You raised the issue of violation so you can prove or disprove it to your preference, however it makes no difference. It's irrelevant to the burden of proof and thus to the case in question about what's viewed as being instantaneous.

[Besoeker]

Originally Posted by LMagic007

As I indicated violation or otherwise is independent of the issue of instantaneous. You raised the issue of violation so you can prove or disprove it to your preference, however it makes no difference. It's irrelevant to the burden of proof and thus to the case in question about what's viewed as being instantaneous.

Instantaneous is well-defined in the context of power and energy. As, indeed are the terms power and energy themselves.
And you want proof? Well here's what happens when you put a generator on line:

Note that power has an instantaneous non-zero value. No passage of time required.
The instantaneous value for energy is zero. It cannot instantaneously have a value - in short you simply can't get instantaneous energy.

[LMagic007]

Originally Posted by Besoeker

Instantaneous is well-defined in the context of power and energy. As, indeed are the terms power and energy themselves.
And you want proof? Well here's what happens when you put a generator on line:

Note that power has an instantaneous non-zero value. No passage of time required.
The instantaneous value for energy is zero. It cannot instantaneously have a value - in short you simply can't get instantaneous energy.

In short, that's not proof, just a pretty picture. Instantaneous energy exists.

[Besoeker]

Originally Posted by LMagic007

In short, that's not proof, just a pretty picture..

OK. Point out where it is flawed.

[forfismum]

Originally Posted by LMagic007

As I indicated violation or otherwise is independent of the issue of instantaneous. You raised the issue of violation so you can prove or disprove it to your preference, however it makes no difference. It's irrelevant to the burden of proof and thus to the case in question about what's viewed as being instantaneous.

thats amazing !!!!

[Besoeker]

Originally Posted by forfismum

thats amazing !!!!

Astonishing.

[LMagic007]

Originally Posted by Besoeker

OK. Point out where, as a proof, it is flawed.

It just re-enforces your own reasoning about energy and power and your notion of instantaneous, but doesn't prove that energy cannot be instantaneous. It might suggest your diagram reflects your point, but that does not automatically translate to your point being correct. Energy is always with us.

[LMagic007]

Originally Posted by Besoeker

Astonishing.

I guess some people are easily amazed and astonished.

[Besoeker]

Originally Posted by LMagic007

It just re-enforces your own reasoning about energy and power and your notion of instantaneous..

Nope. Not mine. Just simple physics.
Where exactly is the physics flawed?