Go Back   The Environment Site Forums > Natural World Forums > Wildlife and Biodiversity Forum

Notices

Wildlife and Biodiversity Forum In the end, our society will be defined not only by what we create, but by what we refuse to destroy. - John Sawhill, The Nature Conservancy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 13th-May-2008, 09:16 PM
Karl's Avatar
Eco Nut
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Trinidad & Tobago
Posts: 286
Karl is on a distinguished road
Default Environmentalists, energy companies look to U.S. for decision on polar bears

The Canadian Press – May 11, 2008

Canadian environmentalists and energy companies will be looking to the American government this week for a decision that will affect everything from the economy of remote northern communities to how this country's energy is sold in the U.S.

After months of delay, a court order will force the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to declare Thursday whether or not it believes polar bears are endangered. "It's coming to a head," said Pete Ewins of the World Wildlife Fund. "The key thing, what are they going to say?" The wildlife service has been expected since January to make a recommendation on whether the great white bears should come under the protection of the Endangered Species Act. Tired of waiting, several American environmental organizations took the service to court over the delay and a judge has ordered it to make a ruling by Thursday.

That decision will be closely watched in Nunavut, where Inuit guides charge American hunters up to $30,000 for the privilege of shooting a polar bear. An endangered species listing would make it nearly impossible to bring trophies from such a hunt into the U.S., a restriction greatly expected to reduce the number of bear sport hunts in the Arctic. The government of Nunavut has intervened in the U.S., asking the service not to declare the bears endangered.

But energy exports to the U.S. could also be affected, says Ewins. Such a listing for polar bears would commit the U.S. to not doing anything that could threaten the species further. Because the main threat to the bears is considered to be habitat loss from climate change, that could make it tougher to sell fuels that produce a higher amount of greenhouse gases, such as oil derived from Alberta's oilsands. "U.S. programs, policies and financial measures involving the U.S. government that would further jeopardize the survival of polar bears would come under extremely strong scrutiny," Ewins said. "Further increases in greenhouse gases, causing the sea ice to melt, would be deemed as clearly in contravention of the Endangered Species Act."

There have already been legislative moves in the U.S. to restrict the use of oilsands-derived oil. American environmental groups have also pressured users such as the airline industry to avoid it. "There are huge implications here for the way fossil fuels are used and extracted," said Ewins. American Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, responsible for the Fish and Wildlife service, was in Ottawa last Friday to meet with Canadian Environment Minister John Baird. Officials confirmed that polar bears were on the agenda.

Canada is also deciding what to do about the massive Arctic predator. The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife In Canada recently said it would recommend the bears remain as a species of special concern. That would oblige Ottawa to address threats to the animal's survival, including climate change, but would give it until 2014 to come up with a management plan for Canada's estimated 15,000 bears. That's a date by which some scientists believe the Arctic could be completely free of summer sea ice - the bears' favoured hunting platform. Baird will receive the committee's report in August and will make a decision some time after that.

Source: The Canadian Press: Environmentalists, energy companies look to U.S. for decision on polar bears

Related: The Great Beyond: Polar bear not ‘endangered’, just ‘concerning’
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15th-May-2008, 02:08 AM
Karl's Avatar
Eco Nut
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Trinidad & Tobago
Posts: 286
Karl is on a distinguished road
Default Interior Dept. lists polar bears as threatened species

By Wallace Witkowski - May 14, 2008

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- The U.S. Department of the Interior said Wednesday it listed polar bears as a threatened species because growing losses of sea ice threaten the animals' natural habitat. Under the Endangered Species Act, a "threatened" species is under serious threats that may eventually lead to its extinction, whereas an "endangered" species is on the brink of extinction. "I am also announcing that this listing decision will be accompanied by administrative guidance and a rule that defines the scope of impact my decision will have, in order to protect the polar bear while limiting the unintended harm to the society and economy of the United States," Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne said in a statement.

Source: Interior Dept. lists polar bears as threatened species - MarketWatch
Related: Polar bear now listed as 'threatened' species - CNN.com
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16th-May-2008, 03:59 PM
Karl's Avatar
Eco Nut
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Trinidad & Tobago
Posts: 286
Karl is on a distinguished road
Default Polar bear "Threatened" – impacts Arctic energy plans?

The US government on Wednesday declared the polar bear a threatened species under federal environmental protection laws, a ruling that may further limit efforts to develop US energy resources in Alaska. The Interior Department said it is listing the polar bear as a threatened species, “based on the best available science, which shows that loss of sea ice threatens and will likely continue to threaten polar bear habitat”.

Advocates of increased US domestic energy development - including many in the US Congress - have long sought access to oil and gas reserves in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) on Alaska’s north coast. The US chemicals industry, which is heavily dependent on natural gas as a feedstock, and the broader manufacturing sector have been appealing to Congress to open ANWR and other US onshore and offshore reserves to development.

Environmentalists have opposed drilling in the refuge on grounds it would disrupt and endanger the wildlife that ANWR was created to protect. Former president Bill Clinton vetoed a congressionally approved ANWR drilling programme in 1995. Under the ESA, an animal group termed threatened could be elevated to the endangered category, which would require broad restrictions on human activity in and around the animal’s habitat. Despite the ruling, Dirk Kempthorne said the US nevertheless can “continue to develop our natural resources in the arctic region in an environmentally sound way”.

Because of the Interior Department ruling, anyone seeking energy development or any other facility construction in polar bear habitat will have to obtain a permit from the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Source: US says polar bear threatened; limits energy work

Related: Global Warming Examiner - Polar Bears Threaten Energy Development - Examiner.com

Video:
YouTube - Polar Bears On Thin Ice (CBS News)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 18th-May-2008, 07:11 AM
include's Avatar
Forum Hermit
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,859
include is on a distinguished road
Default

Scientists believe that at least two-thirds of the world's polar bears will be gone within 40 years. But some say adding them to the endangered species list is just lip service and ignores the real issues.

Is the Polar Bears’ Predicament a Sign of Things to Come?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 19th-May-2008, 09:05 AM
seven's Avatar
Eco Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Humberside
Posts: 746
seven is on a distinguished road
Default

The U.S. decision to list polar bears as a threatened species has indigenous Alaskans worried that hunting the animals they rely on for food and warmth could be banned.

Alaska hunters fret about polar bear ruling | Environment | Reuters
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 23rd-May-2008, 04:13 PM
Eco Nut
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 178
brianidaho
Default

I was curious to see what the popluation of the bears has done over the last 30 years or so that global warmingists use to support global warming theory, I didn't find a good worldwide summary with a quick google search. I did however find the following article. If popluation trends in other areas follow those in eastern Canada it would seem to indicate that GW is a good thing for polar bear populations, since they have increased by nearly 3 times over the period in question.

Another Myth Exposed « Unclemeat

Despite global warming, an ongoing study says polar bear populations are rising in the country’s eastern Arctic region.

Polar bears are the poster animals of global warming. The image of a polar bear floating on an ice floe is one of the most dramatic visual statements in the fight against rising temperatures in the Arctic.

But global warming is not killing the polar bears of Canada’s eastern Arctic, according to one ongoing study. Scheduled for release next year, it says the number of polar bears in the Davis Strait area of Canada’s eastern Arctic – one of 19 polar bear populations worldwide – has grown to 2,100, up from 850 in the mid-1980s.

“There aren’t just a few more bears. There are a … lot more bears,” biologist Mitchell Taylor told the Nunatsiaq News of Iqaluit in the Arctic territory of Nunavut. Earlier, in a long telephone conversation, Dr. Taylor explained his conviction that threats to polar bears from global warming are exaggerated and that their numbers are increasing. He has studied the animals for the Nunavut government for two decades. -
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
biodiversity, endangered species, energy companies, environment issues

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
The Environment Site
Google