Go Back   The Environment Site Forums > Socio-Economic Issues > Waste and Recycling Forum

Notices

Waste and Recycling Forum "There is enough on earth for everybody's need, but not for everyone's greed" - Gandhi

Reply
 
LinkBack (4) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 28th-November-2007, 01:04 PM
spadlet's Avatar
Forum Hermit
Points: 5,331, Level: 46 Points: 5,331, Level: 46 Points: 5,331, Level: 46
Activity: 8% Activity: 8% Activity: 8%
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yorkshire lass, born & bred
Posts: 1,700
spadlet has a spectacular aura aboutspadlet has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wobs
Such negative air pressure systems were proposed for a recycling plant in my area. Despite this, and the fact that it was ideally situated away from houses, and had excellent transport links, the local residents (I use the term loosely!) successfully got the planning rejected. NIMBYism at its worst. As my Grandma pointed out: "What do these people think happens to their waste, do they think that it just gets magiced away."
How come they won? There was loads of negative campaigning in Sheffield about building the new place but Veolia did a really good job correcting the misinformation so that people were talking about the facts. I know the council were already sympathetic to the new development, which would have influenced the plannng decision, but that's why they had all of the figures and legislation etc at the top of their heads when we went round. They've had alot of experience dealing with opposition.

What kind of recycling plant was it? We have one for paper and cardboard that's run by Veolia. There's another one for plastic, textiles and metal stuff run by a local social enterprise called Reclaim.
What were the grounds on which it was rejected?
__________________
'There are only two ways to live your life, accept things as they are or take responsibility for changing them' Bhagat Singh (even if you don't agree with how he chose to apply this philosophy)

"Just ignore it all" {CT}
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 29th-November-2007, 04:25 PM
Moderator
Points: 7,562, Level: 58 Points: 7,562, Level: 58 Points: 7,562, Level: 58
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hull - its getting a bit nippy
Posts: 2,097
Wobs has a spectacular aura aboutWobs has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spadlet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wobs
Such negative air pressure systems were proposed for a recycling plant in my area. Despite this, and the fact that it was ideally situated away from houses, and had excellent transport links, the local residents (I use the term loosely!) successfully got the planning rejected. NIMBYism at its worst. As my Grandma pointed out: "What do these people think happens to their waste, do they think that it just gets magiced away."
How come they won? ?
TBH, I can't recall the exact reasoning, but it was a planning issue. Complete nonesense of course, and it shows that no matter how loudly a group shouts "no", doesn't make them any more right, but they can be successful. Which is a scary thought.

The wastes were to be those collected from houses. ie. plastics, metals, glass, and compostables etc. The composting was to be carried out in the negative air pressure building.

If you ever drive to Hull, you'll drive past the proposed site, just before the turn off for the Humber Bridge. Its a contaminated site as its next to an old landfill, so the land has little alternative use, and being next to a large slip road off the A63, is ideally suited for transport links.

These issues can really get stupid, but a lot of the time, its down to someone in the background who has other property development ideas in the area. But trying to distinguish between what are real concerns or objections, and what are complaints with an alteria motive is hard to spot.

Of course NIMBYism can be a strong force, and the NO camp can come up with a study to say that anything built near their house will affect their kids health.
__________________
"Nero fiddles while Gordon Burns
In my Joy Division Oven Gloves"
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 29th-November-2007, 05:06 PM
Guest
Points: 8,377, Level: 61 Points: 8,377, Level: 61 Points: 8,377, Level: 61
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,029
forfi is on a distinguished road
Default

It seems that Dublin is to get a 600.000 tons /year incinerator.The approval passed the appeals stage and any further objections have to go through the courts.
The nimbys are out in force and the minister for the env, [ a loony green] is quite upset as it is in his back yard so the speak.More on this as it develops,wonder if I can get in as an observer? I would love to see it being constructed.
No doubt this will draw out the objectors in force,one of our best loved serial objectors has tried to block almost 300 private individuals from building homes.he does not live in the same county as any of them.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 1st-December-2007, 01:05 PM
spadlet's Avatar
Forum Hermit
Points: 5,331, Level: 46 Points: 5,331, Level: 46 Points: 5,331, Level: 46
Activity: 8% Activity: 8% Activity: 8%
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yorkshire lass, born & bred
Posts: 1,700
spadlet has a spectacular aura aboutspadlet has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wobs
Of course NIMBYism can be a strong force, and the NO camp can come up with a study to say that anything built near their house will affect their kids health.
That's crazy, if it isn't even building an incinerator. I don't know how the planners could consider such a report to be scientifically valid. BTW apparently, when they were deciding about the new incinerator in Sheffield, somebody did a study and came up with the idea that substituting the district heating system for loads of boilers to provide the equivalent heat 'on location' would produce more CO2 than the incinerator. I don't know how true it is (I haven't even seen the report) but it's an interesting idea.
__________________
'There are only two ways to live your life, accept things as they are or take responsibility for changing them' Bhagat Singh (even if you don't agree with how he chose to apply this philosophy)

"Just ignore it all" {CT}
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10th-December-2007, 11:39 AM
Sapling
Points: 803, Level: 15 Points: 803, Level: 15 Points: 803, Level: 15
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
emxxx is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

That made very interesting reading thanks for sharing
__________________
Em
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 15th-February-2008, 06:13 PM
Besoeker's Avatar
Moderator
Points: 3,418, Level: 36 Points: 3,418, Level: 36 Points: 3,418, Level: 36
Activity: 33% Activity: 33% Activity: 33%
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,208
Besoeker is a jewel in the roughBesoeker is a jewel in the roughBesoeker is a jewel in the rough
Default

Being a relative newbie, this was posted before my time.
I think it is an excellent scheme on a number of counts.
Thanks admin for citing it.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 15th-February-2008, 06:15 PM
Guest
Points: 8,377, Level: 61 Points: 8,377, Level: 61 Points: 8,377, Level: 61
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,029
forfi is on a distinguished road
Default

And its Spadlet's hard work that brought it to our attention.

PS Drat it only allows you to vote once
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 2nd-July-2008, 10:00 AM
Forum Hermit
Points: 5,286, Level: 46 Points: 5,286, Level: 46 Points: 5,286, Level: 46
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,856
Blog Entries: 5
forfismum is on a distinguished road
Default

And failing to note the successful venture in Sheffield,the people of Ireland continue to object to this [and almost all other ] way of dealing with the materials they throw away.

RTÉ News: Indaver to start Meath incinerator work

Many of these protesters,in fact most of them,prolly never do any recycling otherwise there would not be the need for so many incinerators on this little island.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11th-December-2008, 11:24 AM
Sapling
Points: 75, Level: 1 Points: 75, Level: 1 Points: 75, Level: 1
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
Jimbo is on a distinguished road
Default Sheffield Energy Recovery Centre

Hello

I'm new here, but found my way after googling Sheffield Energy Recovery Centre, which brought me to this thread;

waste-recycling-forum/10381-sheffield-energy-recovery-facility-incinerator.htm

(the link might not work because I'm new and not allowed to post links... :/ )

Now, what I'm interested in is the part where Veolia overcame any public resistance to the new plant, how did they do it? Prior engagement with the public, stakeholder meetings...? etc Does anybody on here have any such information? Or for similar projects anywhere, er, in the world really?

I have spoke to Sheffield WM who said they'd get back to me, not sure what their timescales are, though...

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 11th-December-2008, 12:46 PM
adi's Avatar
adi adi is offline
Administrator
Site Boss
Points: 5,739, Level: 48 Points: 5,739, Level: 48 Points: 5,739, Level: 48
Activity: 64% Activity: 64% Activity: 64%
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,341
Blog Entries: 21
adi is a jewel in the roughadi is a jewel in the roughadi is a jewel in the rough
Default

Hi Jimbo, welcome to the forum I've merged your post with the original thread to keep things neat and tidy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
The Environment Site