| Solar Energy Forum I have no doubt that we will be successful in harnessing the sun's energy.... If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago. ~Sir George Porter |

25th-June-2008, 08:14 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,963
|
|
Nanosolar Launches 1-GW Thin-film CIGS Production Tool
Nanosolar Launches 1-GW Thin-film CIGS Production Tool
California, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]
Nanosolar Inc. has launched a new deposition throughput for the production of CIGS thin-film solar cells. The production tool has annual capacity of 1 gigawatt (GW).
Nanosolar Launches 1-GW Thin-film CIGS Production Tool
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Green Instantaneous Energy ! Massive Electrical Storage ! Ultracapacitors Minutes Charging
Disclaimer. Interpret posts with discretion. Conduct research and investigations to satisfy your judgement.
|

25th-June-2008, 09:16 AM
|
|
Eco Warrior
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 504
|
|
Company's blogs says:
Quote:
As we are busy ramping our operation, we almost forgot to recognize achieving a major milestone in solar technology: The solar industry’s first 1GW production tool.
Most production tools in the solar industry tend to have 10-30MW in annual production capacity. How is it possible to have a single tool with Gigawatt throughput?
This feat is fundamentally enabled through the proprietary nanoparticle ink we have invested so many years developing. It allows us to deliver efficient solar cells (presently up to more than 14%) that are simply printed.
Printing is a simple, fast, and robust coating process that in particular eliminates the need for expensive high-vacuum chambers and the kinds of high-vacuum based deposition techniques from industries where there’s a lot more $/sqm available for competitive manufacturing cost.
Our 1GW CIGS coater cost $1.65 million. At the 100 feet-per-minute speed shown in the video, that’s an astonishing two orders of magnitude more capital efficient than a high-vacuum process: a twenty times slower high-vacuum tool would have cost about ten times as much per tool.
Plus if we cared to run it even faster, we could. (The same coating technique works in principle for speeds up to 2000 feet-per-minute too. In fact, it turns out the faster we run, the better the coating!)
|
Much more info is required as how much land, what kind of batteries etc are required to make the project feasible.
Where are the experts?
|

25th-June-2008, 09:20 AM
|
|
Eco Warrior
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 504
|
|
Check this out too...
Quote:
Paul Maycock, president of solar-electric consulting and research firm Photovoltaic Energy Systems, said the announcement, if true, is very important.
After all, manufacturing costs for thin-film leader First Solar’s cadmium-telluride films are about $1 per watt, he said. That would equate to $1 billion for a gigawatt, with everything included.
While Nanosolar’s $1.65 million wouldn’t include the costs for the whole line, but just for one tool, it implies a “very significant” cost reduction, Maycock said.
“If they’ve got that, they’ve got the world by the tail,” he said. “It sounds like a major accomplishment, but the proof is in the product.”
Maycock warned that an announcement isn’t proof, and added that Nanosolar has been putting out press rele ases for years. In 2006, the company said it planned to reach mass production in 2007 (see Nanosolar to Build in San Jose).
“When are they going to have products?” he asked. “When can I buy them? Show me a product that I can check the efficiency of and can get for $2 or less. I have to adopt a ‘show me’ attitude with Nanosolar, but I don’t say they can’t do it – I hope they do. We need 14 percent thin films with prices below $2 a watt right now.”
|
|

25th-June-2008, 09:35 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,963
|
|
No doubt more will be revealed, but it's an interesting milestone to have a tool that can literally print / roll / out 1 GW of solar cells annually that costs $1.65 million. This represents phenomenal automated productive capacity when multiplied out to many such tools and presumably value for money. We will await with baited breath.
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Green Instantaneous Energy ! Massive Electrical Storage ! Ultracapacitors Minutes Charging
Disclaimer. Interpret posts with discretion. Conduct research and investigations to satisfy your judgement.
Last edited by LMagic007; 25th-June-2008 at 09:41 AM.
|

25th-June-2008, 12:42 PM
|
|
Eco Warrior
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 504
|
|
I suggest you read my 2nd post once more. There is clear mention that final would come around 1 billion but that too is almost 50% of what its costing today.
|

25th-June-2008, 01:08 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,963
|
|
Indeed, a projected 50% cost reduction appears like a major development.
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Green Instantaneous Energy ! Massive Electrical Storage ! Ultracapacitors Minutes Charging
Disclaimer. Interpret posts with discretion. Conduct research and investigations to satisfy your judgement.
|

25th-June-2008, 01:21 PM
|
|
Eco Warrior
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 504
|
|
Sure it is.
|

25th-June-2008, 03:31 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,963
|
|
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Green Instantaneous Energy ! Massive Electrical Storage ! Ultracapacitors Minutes Charging
Disclaimer. Interpret posts with discretion. Conduct research and investigations to satisfy your judgement.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 AM.
| |