Go Back   The Environment Site Forums > Energy Forums > Solar Energy Forum

Notices

Solar Energy Forum I have no doubt that we will be successful in harnessing the sun's energy.... If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago. ~Sir George Porter

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 10th-June-2008, 06:25 AM
LMagic007's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,892
LMagic007 is on a distinguished road
Default

[quote=SgtThursday;241805]
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMagic007 View Post
... and if you have enough tanks and enough collector area you can store much more energy than would be provided for in calculations made thus far in this thread

Of course you can. But the site is clear on what it promises - all that from 7 tube banks.

No more oxygen to this. I'm out.
Sorry but do we know what each panel is rated at ? I couldn't see where they indicated that. How many tubes per panel ? I just didn't see this information on the site. I see they mention 7 panels. I see you noted the dimensions, and from that I can see how you derived the workings and I do agree it raises questions. I think the conversion efficiencies may reveal more information.
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Quote:
Parabolic trough plants could yield capacity factors greater than 70%, competing directly with future baseload coal plants. NREL: TroughNet - Parabolic Trough Power Plant Market, Economic Assessment and Deployment
Green Instantaneous Energy ! Massive Electrical Storage ! Ultracapacitors Minutes Charging
Disclaimer. Interpret posts with discretion. Conduct research and investigations to satisfy your judgement.

Last edited by LMagic007; 10th-June-2008 at 06:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 10th-June-2008, 06:34 AM
Sapling
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7
SgtThursday is on a distinguished road
Default

They also give the tube bank area as 2m * 2.4 m. The aperture area of the tubes must therefore be less than this. I have used the gross area which is yet another "benefit of the doubt" assumption.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 10th-June-2008, 07:12 AM
LMagic007's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,892
LMagic007 is on a distinguished road
Default

I certainly think it might be worth getting to the bottom of and I agree that on the surface, a number of claims don't seem to compute.
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Quote:
Parabolic trough plants could yield capacity factors greater than 70%, competing directly with future baseload coal plants. NREL: TroughNet - Parabolic Trough Power Plant Market, Economic Assessment and Deployment
Green Instantaneous Energy ! Massive Electrical Storage ! Ultracapacitors Minutes Charging
Disclaimer. Interpret posts with discretion. Conduct research and investigations to satisfy your judgement.

Last edited by LMagic007; 10th-June-2008 at 07:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
The Environment Site
Google