| Solar Energy Forum I have no doubt that we will be successful in harnessing the sun's energy.... If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago. ~Sir George Porter |

8th-April-2008, 10:19 AM
|
 |
Eco Warrior
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 943
|
|
Oh the potential of solar
It may take at least 10 years of intensive research and development to reduce the cost of solar energy to levels competitive with petroleum, an expert warned today.
"Solar can potentially provide all the electricity and fuel we need to power the planet," Professor Harry Gray told the 235th national meeting of the American Chemical Society (ACS) in New Orleans.
Channel 4 - News - Solar energy 'could power world'
Seems to sum up solar for me. Sooo much potential at the moment but not quite there yet.
|

12th-April-2008, 06:00 AM
|
|
Eco Nut
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 230
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparky
It may take at least 10 years of intensive research and development to reduce the cost of solar energy to levels competitive with petroleum, an expert warned today.
"Solar can potentially provide all the electricity and fuel we need to power the planet," Professor Harry Gray told the 235th national meeting of the American Chemical Society (ACS) in New Orleans.
Channel 4 - News - Solar energy 'could power world'
Seems to sum up solar for me. Sooo much potential at the moment but not quite there yet.
|
I am of the opinion that "they" are trying to tell "us" to go back to sleep.
We have consumer and voter power.
Where do your tax dollars go?
*Angry yet?!?*
__________________
Attack is invisible. Awareness is no escape.
"ROAR LIKE A BOAR!"
Don't lick the earth. (Tesla???)
"I would far rather be happy than right, any day."
"And are you?"
"No. That's where it all falls down, of course." - Douglas Adams
|

12th-April-2008, 09:33 AM
|
 |
Forum Hermit
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,653
|
|
It will get there eventually, with or without state help.
|

16th-April-2008, 06:35 PM
|
 |
Sapling
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
|
|
Quote:
|
The professor cited the vast potential of solar energy, noting that more energy from sunlight strikes the Earth in one hour than all of the energy consumed on the planet in one year.
|
That is a lot of energy. However, we don't have the entire surface of the earth covered with solar panels or the batteries required to hold the charge. Near the equator it is great option but the farther you get to the polls the harder solar power is to make effective. It is a great way to take the burden off of fossil fuels and nuclear but it won't 100% replace our need for energy by itself.
I'm not shooting down solar power I love it I just don't see it realistically pull all of the earth's energy needs alone without a significant increase in our capture and storage abilities.
|

16th-April-2008, 07:20 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,392
|
|
I think the professor might have been speaking conceptually. However relying on just one energy technology clearly would not be practical. No doubt though as costs for solar technologies fall , their application will likely increase in nations where they are best suited.
It's a bit like the 92 mile squared solar theory to power all of the United States. It's nice to know because it gives you an idea of the scope and scale of the technologies from a theoretical standpoint, which helps to appreciate the overall potential. Variability of renewable energy supply dictates a requirement to have a balanced mix of technology, even though its evident that Solar Thermal with storage might approach the higher capacity factors of coal when implemented appropriately.
A more reliable long term mix say for the USA and Australia might be perhaps say 50% solar thermal and solar PV, 20% wind, 20% bio-fuels, 10% fossil fuels to help balance the grids. Sufficient thermal storage can improve a CSP plants grid contribution stability. Again though that mix would depend on each nations situation. Clearly some nations might be more heavily dependant on fossil fuels and thus be better suited to a different mix ratio.
See NRELs views on Solar Thermal energy and baseload potential;
Either way solar thermal in general has significant potential.
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Green Instantaneous Energy ! Massive Electrical Storage ! Ultracapacitors Minutes Charging
Disclaimer. Interpret posts with discretion. Conduct research and investigations to satisfy your judgement.
Last edited by LMagic007; 26th-April-2008 at 06:05 AM.
|

16th-April-2008, 09:21 PM
|
 |
Forum Hermit
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,777
|
|
This is an interesting thought, mirrors are a hell of a lot cheaper than solar panels and more efficient too, so for the poor, the government can set up a boiling towers/electricity generators, and people can just buy mirrors instead of covering their houses in solar panels. So we all become shareholders that reduce our electricity bill.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 PM.
| |