Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?

[GreenGoblin]

I am amazed by how many people I talk to and how many posts I see on the forums these days that agree with the "need" to reduce the population.

It seems like everyone is going crazy! I see calls for a "one child policy", calls for making large families an "eco-crime" and calls for eliminating 90 percent of the earth's population all over the internet.

It seems as though more and more people are buying into the propaganda of the New World Order. Look at what the following article is saying about this situation:

-----

Shattered Paradigm: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?

Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?

Today the call for depopulating the earth has grown louder than ever. College professors are given standing ovations by their students when they call for a 90 percent reduction in the human population of the earth. Ted Turner states "A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal", and the global elite applaud him. The Georgia Guidestones which call for us to "maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature" are quoted more and more with approval by our leaders.

What is this world coming to?

It seems as though for the global elite, every major crisis these days is an opportunity to further one of the key pillars of their agenda:

Less people.

Problem: Gas costs too much and we are faced with "global warming".

Answer: Get rid of a whole bunch of people and we will use less gas and we will produce less "greenhouse gases".

Problem: Medical costs are increasing.

Answer: Get rid of a whole bunch of people and kill off the elderly and we will have fewer medical costs.

Now Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, has the perfect solution for the "food crisis":

Get rid of a whole bunch of people......

-----

Article continued here:

Shattered Paradigm: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?

[forfismum]

Who the hell is Ted Turner?

[spadlet]

Originally Posted by forfismum

Who the hell is Ted Turner?

I thought Green Goblin was another of Forfi's Mum's accounts, in memory of a debacle last year. Welcome to the forum Green Goblin.

[Windguy]

Originally Posted by spadlet

I thought Green Goblin was another of Forfi's Mum's accounts, in memory of a debacle last year. Welcome to the forum Green Goblin.

ha, yes those were the days the Green Gobby Gobshite and R33 self claiming to be the GGG Buster . Poor guy though, he did value the environment in his own right and deserves a pat on the back just for that.

Hopefully Forfi hasn't said anything to Forfismum, otherwise I might be in deep doodoo for defending the GGG of old...

[imp]

Liberals want government to "do something" about "problems", AKA violate the liberty of a nation's citizens. Conservatives want liberty and less government involvement. Note I am speaking of political philosophy, not political party.

Many liberals want government to intervene to reduce populations through funding Orwellian projects such as "family planning". They they think that they know better than everone else, because they are elitist scum.

[Wowbagger]

Asking the government to do something for you or doing something yourself are both synonymous of liberty. Except that the consequences of the government's actions are theoretically assured to be acceptable for the majority.

[Richard]

I doubt many people "ask" the Government to do most of the things they actually do though.

[spadlet]

Originally Posted by imp

Many liberals want government to intervene to reduce populations through funding Orwellian projects such as "family planning". They they think that they know better than everone else, because they are elitist scum.

I was under the impression that 'Family Planning' services were available IF people chose to use them, rather than organisations then went prying into peoples' personal lives forcing them to take actions that prevented them from having children, in what way was I misled?

I was also under the impression that it was decided to fund services such as free at point of use abortion and contraception to overcome the problems of the time that related to women trying to induce abortions in themselves or at worst killing themselves or their new born babies in cases where the pregnancy was unwanted. Have I been misled in that case as well? If so, how?

[forfismum]

Gosh Spadlet,dont confuse the "drop-in" family planning services that you find in the UK with the plans of the nutters who want to control world population.There is a review of a new book in the Sunday Times today " Fatal Misconception" by Matthew Connelly and some of the quotes from it would make you cringe,example

In 1976 Indira Ghandi's government had 8 million Indians sterilised,forcibly ,in many cases.Although at least 2000 died as a result,
many in the population -control establishment egged her on

......a movement that believed it was acting from the highest humanitarian ideals became responsible for callus abuses of human rights on a global scale,ruining mamillions of lives in a grotesque eugenic experiment

[wmiddlemas]

Well, human reproduction has generally been seen as a basic human right. But the earth is in crisis and replacing light bulbs with flouresents, or riding a bicycle rather than using a car will not solve the climate or pollution crisis. The problem is that the earth has too many humans all wanting to live the highly extravagant and wastful lifestyle of the developed western world. There is no way that, that lifestyle could even be initiated much less sustained for the current 6.5 billion souls on this planet much less for the projected 9.0 billion in 2030 ! So unless we reduce the human footprint, substantially, we and the present species on this planet are probably doomed.

Family planning programs could make a great inroad into reducing the population, with focus on the developing nations where population growth is totally out of control. With a worldwide coordinated effort, we could see substantial reductions in populations in 50 years, and a dramatic positive impact on the planet's climate, resources and eventually living standards of all.