Go Back   The Environment Site Forums > Energy Forums > Nuclear Energy Forum
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Nuclear Energy Forum "There is not the slightest indication that nuclear energy will ever be obtainable" - Albert Einstein

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 9th-May-2008, 04:26 AM
LMagic007's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,338
LMagic007 is on a distinguished road
Default Slow Train to Yucca Mountain & Green Nuclear ?

Quote:
Slow Train to Yucca Mountain
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2008/05/slow-train-to-yucca-mountain.html

Also an artilce on nuclear being green
Quote:
Nuclear power could lose green tag, research shows
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/04/30/2231769.htm

???
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Quote:
Parabolic trough plants could yield capacity factors greater than 70%, competing directly with future baseload coal plants.
NREL: TroughNet - Parabolic Trough Power Plant Market, Economic Assessment and Deployment
Disclaimer - Interpret all information at your own discretion. Don't solely rely on forumite views to form an opinion. Conduct your own research and investigations to help satisfy your own judgement.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 9th-May-2008, 10:45 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hull - its getting a bit nippy
Posts: 1,746
Wobs is on a distinguished road
Default

LOL. Only in the US:
"it even printed up T-shirts and coffee mugs for visitors to purchase at lunchtime."

While there are some good points in the article, regarding the ploitical history of the issue, it does fall foul of some classic areas, such as mentioning that there is a dairy down gradient to it. This is hardly relevant when the repository is deep below the ground.

It also is misleading in that it claims much of the waste (uranium) will be dangerous for for 4.5 billion years. This is simply untrue.

If they were to use Yucca as a place for disposing of fuel that will have been spent after reprocessing and reuse, the stuff left over will be safe far sooner.
__________________
"Nero fiddles while Gordon Burns
In my Joy Division Oven Gloves"
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 9th-May-2008, 09:58 PM
Besoeker's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 426
Besoeker is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Whether Nuclear is green or not, there are no viable alternatives on the required scale in the short to medium term.
Other than fossils, of course.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10th-May-2008, 07:26 AM
LMagic007's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,338
LMagic007 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
Whether Nuclear is green or not, there are no viable alternatives on the required scale in the short to medium term.
Other than fossils, of course.
Whatever the short and medium term represent ? Well the short term may be seen probably within the next 10 years as that's how long it can take to plan and build a typical nuclear power station and sometimes longer. Therefore there needs to be solutions within that period that can be applied. Solar and wind technologies are being rolled out to help supplement grid requirements now and over a 10 year period they can expect to make a valuable and significant contribution of scale, at current growth rates of these technologies. Also based on current cost projections, in 10 years time renewable energy technologies will be even more efficient and cost competitive. These are viable alternatives for supplementary purposes, however as I have always maintained, no single power generation technology can be relied upon globally, as we head into an uncertain future.
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Quote:
Parabolic trough plants could yield capacity factors greater than 70%, competing directly with future baseload coal plants.
NREL: TroughNet - Parabolic Trough Power Plant Market, Economic Assessment and Deployment
Disclaimer - Interpret all information at your own discretion. Don't solely rely on forumite views to form an opinion. Conduct your own research and investigations to help satisfy your own judgement.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10th-May-2008, 05:52 PM
Eco Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 795
forfismum is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LMagic007 View Post
Also based on current cost projections, in 10 years time renewable energy technologies will be even more efficient and cost competitive. .
And all other technologies will just stay as is?
__________________
Matt Cutts, a software engineer at Google since January 2000, used to work for the National Security Agency.

Keyhole, the satellite imaging company that Google acquired in October 2004, was funded by the CIA.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10th-May-2008, 08:10 PM
LMagic007's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,338
LMagic007 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by forfismum View Post
And all other technologies will just stay as is?

Of course not. Other technologies will obviously improve over time. The problem is, those other energy technologies that use fossil fuels, are projected to increase in terms of delivery price per kWh over time, regardless of their technical improvements. On the other hand, renewable energy of varying forms, is on the whole expected to fall in terms of delivery price per kWh over time as its technology improves and fossil fuel prices are squeezed further.

Also fossil fuel power generation will also be squeezed by carbon tariffs before very long. This will put more demand pressure on all other energy resources, but other even clean fossil fuel based resources will have to serve a greater demand as coal based power generation becomes less competitive and clean coal more expensive. This could also squeeze renewable energy prices up, but they will likely be least effected out of all, because their fuel is not limited in the same way that fossil fuels are. i.e once the plant has been built, there is no fuel cost.

The problem fossil fuels have is their finality or at least in a more pragmatic sense, limited supply at a given cost, in the face of growing demand for a resource that is far more finite than renewable energy. The world is at a point historically, where the curves for cost between the two energy types are converging. Fossil fuel prices have already risen and are expected to rise further. As oil rises in price, so will other fossil fuels as they then also become more sought after as a substitute to replace dependency on oil. They are also driven up in price by the global trading.

This is fairly much common knowledge, but there might be others interested in this perspective. Its happening as we speak day by day, so we may as well be as prepared as we can be, which means we need to aggressively evolve the renewable energy base to help take up this increasing demand, wherever it can and save our fossil fuels for when we really need them the most. I have always maintained though that we can't rely on any single energy resource into the future.
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Quote:
Parabolic trough plants could yield capacity factors greater than 70%, competing directly with future baseload coal plants.
NREL: TroughNet - Parabolic Trough Power Plant Market, Economic Assessment and Deployment
Disclaimer - Interpret all information at your own discretion. Don't solely rely on forumite views to form an opinion. Conduct your own research and investigations to help satisfy your own judgement.

Last edited by LMagic007; 10th-May-2008 at 08:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10th-May-2008, 08:41 PM
Besoeker's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 426
Besoeker is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LMagic007 View Post
These are viable alternatives for supplementary purposes, .
I agree with that.
What we needed now, in UK, is bulk power generation to replace plants being taken out of service.
Sadly, I think we have done too little too late.
I'm an old coger. Perhaps the crunch won't kick in to any serious extent before I shuffle off my mortal coils.
That doesn't make me feel any better about it.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10th-May-2008, 09:33 PM
Eco Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 795
forfismum is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LMagic007 View Post
Also fossil fuel power generation will also be squeezed by carbon tariffs before very long.
Only if the nutters get their way and that roller-coaster is slowing right down.The scam of man-made whatever is over and alternative intermittent power will take its proper place at about 10% of total requirments.You can fool some of the people some of the time ...etc.
__________________
Matt Cutts, a software engineer at Google since January 2000, used to work for the National Security Agency.

Keyhole, the satellite imaging company that Google acquired in October 2004, was funded by the CIA.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11th-May-2008, 06:55 PM
LMagic007's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,338
LMagic007 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by forfismum View Post
Only if the nutters get their way and that roller-coaster is slowing right down.The scam of man-made whatever is over and alternative intermittent power will take its proper place at about 10% of total requirments.You can fool some of the people some of the time ...etc.
And all people most of the time. I have little doubt though in terms of a global average, it will extend well beyond 10% in the longer term once energy storage has been improved and it's cost sufficiently lowered.
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Quote:
Parabolic trough plants could yield capacity factors greater than 70%, competing directly with future baseload coal plants.
NREL: TroughNet - Parabolic Trough Power Plant Market, Economic Assessment and Deployment
Disclaimer - Interpret all information at your own discretion. Don't solely rely on forumite views to form an opinion. Conduct your own research and investigations to help satisfy your own judgement.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11th-May-2008, 06:58 PM
Eco Nut
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 108
Deathridesahorse is an unknown quantity at this point
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by forfismum View Post
Only if the nutters get their way and that roller-coaster is slowing right down.The scam of man-made whatever is over and alternative intermittent power will take its proper place at about 10% of total requirments.You can fool some of the people some of the time ...etc.
...are you a disinformation agent who has it all bassackwards....(?!?)
__________________
Attack is invisible. Awareness is no escape.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
The Environment Site
Google