Go Back   The Environment Site Forums > Energy Forums > Fossil Fuels and Peak Oil Forum
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Fossil Fuels and Peak Oil Forum Restore human legs as a means of travel. Pedestrians rely on food for fuel and need no special parking facilities - Lewis Mumford

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 9th-May-2008, 01:02 PM
Eco Nut
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 266
eclipse
Default

Found one article on it...
An oil & gas Shangri-la in the Arctic? | EnergyBulletin.net | Peak Oil News Clearinghouse
==============


It is remarkable how little information1 the USGS provides about how they got their East Greenland results. There is no easily available document that provides a detailed description of their methodology. Slide #7 in their East Greenland Shelf: Protoype for the USGS Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal presentation (flash file) states that it was not possible to do a discovery history analysis, prospect counting, or reservoir modeling because "assessment techniques are limited in unexplored basins." What's left? A geologic synthesis and analog modeling. The precise meaning of these phrases is not clear. Slide #8 gives a flow diagram of equally vague terms.

It is important to provide an easy way to evaluate the USGS methodology. The gold rush in the Arctic is on. These USGS estimates will be cited for many years to come in order to justify all sorts of stunts or boondoggles—or worse. Omitting the documentation discourages independent evaluation of how these speculative numbers were arrived. If the numbers are hard to evaluate, then it is more likely that the USGS estimates will be reified, i.e. regarded or treated as if they have concrete or material existence. That's exactly what happened with the apocryphal "25 percent" number that surfaces in press accounts. The USGS estimates do not have a meaning independent of the theoretical framework that was used to calculate them.
__________________
EclipseNow.blogspot.com

Free Peak Oil posters for you to download and put up in your local library and shops
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 18th-May-2008, 04:01 PM
Eco Nut
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 175
nemesis9 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

The 400 billion claim is just that, a claim. It is unsubstantiated. AO&G is putting in a claim like lots of other people. Even if there were 400 billion barrels that would be less than 15 years supply at current usage rates. And it would take more than a decade to get it flowing. And who knows what the flow rates would be. Flow rate is the key issue in peak oil. The world currently needs about 85 million barrels each and every day to keep the economy humming.
Peak oil doesn't mean running out of oil, it means the flow rates become so decreased that it is no longer viable for our daily transport needs, which is where about 70% of the oil is used for.
__________________
“The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.”
Albert Einstein

A wise man knows how to avoid problems that a clever man knows how to solve.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
The Environment Site
Google