View Single Post
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 20th-July-2008, 04:05 AM
Karl's Avatar
Karl Karl is offline
Eco Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Trinidad & Tobago
Posts: 593
Karl is a jewel in the roughKarl is a jewel in the roughKarl is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to Karl Send a message via Yahoo to Karl Send a message via Skype™ to Karl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mellow_hendrix View Post
On the plus side its giving the British athletes a ready made excuse for when we trail home last "it was the pollution guv!"
Some have already tried that excuse; and not just British ones…
Quote:
Originally Posted by bruce View Post
If they don't get a handle on the smog then the Olympics could prove to be the biggest advert for environmentalism ever. All it will take is a few marathon runners to keel over or something and the message will be rammed home loud and clear.
And what will that lead to “environmental protests”!? – not much prospect for that, since the official state response to “democracy protests” by university students in Tiamenan Square in 1989 rammed home a much louder and clearer message.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spadlet View Post
In that case, can I add an aditional suggestion of the free loan of as many spare bicycles as they can find to the people that will not be allowed to use their cars and the setting up of a car sharing network that is free to join and participate in. This might help the people deprived of their cars to experience alternatives that could have a lasting contribution on transport pollution levels. Maybe people that took part in the car sharing could even be entered into a prize draw...to win one of those bike taxis and a driver for a year that can be used by the shared car users instead of the shared car?
I think human-powered rickshaws are more popular means of environmentally friendly means of transport.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prashamk View Post
That was about 6-8 years back.
I wonder what made them think that an overpopulated rapidly industrializing emerging economy would find a way to do that while at the same time significantly cut pollution and improve environmental quality. Was the world really so utopian back in 2000?

Quote:
Originally Posted by forfismum View Post

This looks a bit more like a reference to the socio-economic environment than to pollution per se, so a good response to this one may very well be:

CHINA Beijing 2008: bars forbidden to serve "blacks" and Mongolians, outdoor tables banned - Asia News

Quote:
Originally Posted by kepler View Post
And yet the Olympic Committee handed the games over to Beijing. Bravo.
Overall, it appears that environmental quality or air pollution are not a major factor in the awarding of major international sporting events to host nations – an example being the fact that Mexico City also has similar problems with smog, etc. but it still looks like they will be hosting the World Cup 2010.

**link not yet available, will be in the near future**
Reply With Quote