Quote:
Originally Posted by ThankyouMoneypenny
Although you are right about the infrared from the sun - that was a stupid thing for me to say and it will teach me to post when I am tired - but, in general, I can safely say that you have lived up to my expectations.
None of my questions were answered and you have tried to deflect my main point about your lack of hard evidence. When you grow up you may learn that hurling insults is easy. Having the guts to admit you are wrong and answering a direct question is more difficult - especially when you have nothing to answer with.
You are prepared to be complicit with an organisation which is going to cost the governments (and people) of this planet trillions of dollars on the flimsiest of evidence from computer models - and you accuse me of trying to screw the world? Doomsday cult? Pathetic. What on Earth are you on? Where did you get the idea that I think mankind cannot affect the planet? Have you read any of my previous posts? Affecting the planet in many ways and causing climate change are two different subjects. Stop avoiding the point and start earning some respect.
Oh, and I don't want to be picky, but 'your' is a possessive adjective which you seem to use instead of 'you're', which is a contraction of 'you are'. Your insults tend to lose impact when you can't construct a coherent sentence properly.
|
I too have raised questions that are still awaiting answers, such as why are arctic and alpine regions warming more then other areas if the change is due to extra evaporation from man made sources?
The point is your denying that there is hard evidence, and there is; the spectrograph. The fact that you don't believe is irrelevant, its true and it has shown to be true.
Your point with the sun was not some random mistake. Reading your post it seems that untill yesterday your whole objection to AGW is based on the fact that the sun does not emit enough IR to effect the climate. It seems to me that you were implying that most of the energy that we think CO2 absorbs just passes straight through the atmosphere and this fact is not accounted for by the AGW crowd. true I make mistakes as well, but you have to admit that
you're hardly qualified to say whether or not enough data exists to make a judgment.