Quote:
Originally Posted by spot1234
The motto is a joke, taken from a scene in a film with a kangaroo court.
You have no interest in the truth your playing to the gallery. Its obvious, you raise questions
you say we can't answer and are the linchpin of our case and when in due course they are answered you just raise new questions. I've seen it before, Your ten-a-penny on the internet you want to take over any forum where this subject is discussed and stop all intelligent discussion. I don't know if your all part of some doomsday cult trying to fuck the world up by using half assed arguments from bloggs to convince stupid people that mankind can't possibly have any effect on the world or what.
You do however raise some interesting questions, but I assume that Google is blocked wherever you access the internet from because if you had spent ten minutes searching for those questions that the AGW crowd is apparently dodging you could have found answers.
Since time is pressing I will just attempt to answer one.
Without the greenhouse effect the earth would have the same average temperature as the moon. We know its different, we know how different we know its due to the atmosphere and we know from the spectrograph already referred to what percentage to attribute to CO2.
I meant all light including IR The frequency is irrelevant its the amount of IR that it absorbs that is relevant. I am impressed that you know the frequency that CO2 absorbs IR. I however am less impressed by the statement "Something as hot as the sun cannot give off low frequency radiation, called infrared."
You want some stinking evidence, Look at the sun with a IR camera. I don't know if it would be covered by warranty if you took it back to the shop after the experiment.
|
Although you are right about the infrared from the sun - that was a stupid thing for me to say and it will teach me to post when I am tired - but, in general, I can safely say that you have lived up to my expectations.
None of my questions were answered and you have tried to deflect my main point about your lack of hard evidence. When you grow up you may learn that hurling insults is easy. Having the guts to admit you are wrong and answering a direct question is more difficult - especially when you have nothing to answer with.
You are prepared to be complicit with an organisation which is going to cost the governments (and people) of this planet trillions of dollars on the flimsiest of evidence from computer models - and you accuse
me of trying to screw the world? Doomsday cult? Pathetic. What on Earth are you on? Where did you get the idea that I think mankind cannot affect the planet? Have you read any of my previous posts? Affecting the planet in many ways and causing climate change are two different subjects. Stop avoiding the point and start earning some respect.
Oh, and I don't want to be picky, but 'your' is a possessive adjective which you seem to use instead of 'you're', which is a contraction of 'you are'. Your insults tend to lose impact when you can't construct a coherent sentence properly.