View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10th-May-2008, 07:26 AM
LMagic007's Avatar
LMagic007 LMagic007 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,761
LMagic007 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
Whether Nuclear is green or not, there are no viable alternatives on the required scale in the short to medium term.
Other than fossils, of course.
Whatever the short and medium term represent ? Well the short term may be seen probably within the next 10 years as that's how long it can take to plan and build a typical nuclear power station and sometimes longer. Therefore there needs to be solutions within that period that can be applied. Solar and wind technologies are being rolled out to help supplement grid requirements now and over a 10 year period they can expect to make a valuable and significant contribution of scale, at current growth rates of these technologies. Also based on current cost projections, in 10 years time renewable energy technologies will be even more efficient and cost competitive. These are viable alternatives for supplementary purposes, however as I have always maintained, no single power generation technology can be relied upon globally, as we head into an uncertain future.
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Quote:
Parabolic trough plants could yield capacity factors greater than 70%, competing directly with future baseload coal plants. NREL: TroughNet - Parabolic Trough Power Plant Market, Economic Assessment and Deployment
Green Energy in an instant ! Massive Electrical Storage ! EEStor Minutes Charging
Disclaimer. Interpret posts with discretion. Conduct research and investigations to satisfy your judgement.
Reply With Quote