View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 30th-April-2008, 09:21 AM
Deathridesahorse Deathridesahorse is offline
Eco Nut
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 230
Deathridesahorse is on a distinguished road
Exclamation HELP: What does this mean?

April, 2008


Nuclear Fuel Recycling: More Trouble Than It's Worth
Plans are afoot to reuse spent reactor fuel in the U.S. But the advantages of the scheme pale in comparison with its dangers
By Frank N. von Hippel


Fear and Loathing in Nevada
The long-term fate of radioactive waste in the U.S. hinges on how the current impasse over Yucca Mountain is resolved. Opinion on the site is divided. The regulatory requirements are tough: the DOE has to show that the mountain will contain the waste well enough to prevent significant off-site doses for a million years.
...

source: Nuclear Fuel Recycling: More Trouble Than It's Worth: Scientific American

<<

Is it an admission the science generally assumes that off-site doses will inevitably occur?
__________________
Attack is invisible. Awareness is no escape.

"ROAR LIKE A BOAR!"

Don't lick the earth. (Tesla???)

"I would far rather be happy than right, any day."
"And are you?"
"No. That's where it all falls down, of course." - Douglas Adams
Reply With Quote