[cbacba]

forfi,

why bother asking? spot has already stated it's not a problem if most measuring stations don't have a similar problem. If only 10% of the stations had that level of a problem, it would explain all the recent warming. Also, the corrections supposedly done to fix heat bubble urban problem clearly do not. Instead, they lower temperatures from earlier measurements prior to the problem. Finally, spot assumes this is the opinion of some blog spot rather than realizing the proof is provided here as charts straight from GISS along with references to the GISS website. I guess spot doesn't realize that the GISS website is the orginator. Spot also assumes that climate audit has somehow manipulated the GISS data located on the GISS website or that somehow or another, it's possible for them to screw up the visual observation of two provided charts. Spot also thinks the sat. data matches the surface data.

I do like the way spot states that there is ice loss except where it is being built up by snowfall - evidently without realizing that this is the way the ice builds up and without sufficient snowfall, ice will dissappear regardless of temperature because of sublimation. There is also good theory that suggests snowfall cannot happen without open oceans to provide the humidity for the snow, meaning that without the open oceans up there, there will be insufficient moisture to allow snowfall to increase any ice - which infers it has to be cyclical.

lol