View Single Post
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 20th-February-2008, 03:36 PM
Bored Wombat's Avatar
Bored Wombat Bored Wombat is offline
Eco Warrior
Points: 2,652, Level: 31 Points: 2,652, Level: 31 Points: 2,652, Level: 31
Activity: 43% Activity: 43% Activity: 43%
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oceania
Posts: 738
Bored Wombat has a spectacular aura aboutBored Wombat has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by forfi View Post
Ignoring the nonsense posted above ,let us move swiftly onto some real discussion.Claims that there is a unanimous agreement amongst scientists on any subject is just plain bollocks.
I didn't say there was a unanimous agreement. I just said that no reputable scientific organisation nor national science academy has released statements contradicting the IPCC. Therefore your claim that most scientists disagree with the IPCC is complete bollocks. But we already knew that because there are no peer reviewed scientific papers that contradict the IPCC's view that the current warming is mostly anthropogenic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by forfi View Post
There are some 400,000 graduate scientists from Indian universities each year and they are not clamoring to sign up for the IPCC beauty pageant.
Rubbish. Partaking in the IPCC involves a whole lot of reading and reviewing other peoples work. The beauty pageant is to do your own work, and have it recognised. Which is why the Nobel prize is so well deserved. The scientists involved took time from their lives and careers in a thankless task because they felt it was important.

Quote:
Originally Posted by forfi View Post
I will quote again
[/color] " After introducing myself, I sat in silence as their discussion continued, which boiled down to this: "We must write this report so strongly that it will convince the US to sign the Kyoto Protocol." Politics, at least for a few of the Lead Authors, was very much part and parcel of the process."
And yet 100% of the published research that I am aware of supports the IPCC findings. I am confident that means that over 95% of the published research supports them. Which is why I can say with confidence that for any peer reviewed scientific paper in the last 15 years that claims the recent warming is mostly natural I will be able to find 20 that claim that it is mostly anthropogenic.

No matter how you cherry pick statements from one scientist present at some of the IPCC meetings, the research tells the story strongly and clearly: Global warming is anthropogenic.