View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 20th-February-2008, 02:22 PM
LMagic007's Avatar
LMagic007 LMagic007 is offline
Moderator
Points: 8,910, Level: 63 Points: 8,910, Level: 63 Points: 8,910, Level: 63
Activity: 34% Activity: 34% Activity: 34%
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,399
LMagic007 will become famous soon enough
Default

On the basis that Solar Thermal with storage can provide about 70% capacity factor, the 69% they estimate seems in line with this factor.

Quote:
But $420 billion in subsidies from 2011 to 2050 would be required to fund the infrastructure and make it cost-competitive
A Solar Grand Plan: Scientific American

Hmm that seems a bit less than the cost of the Iraq war to date, that's now costing around $100 billion a year. Sounds like a good investment over 40 years. I actually think conceptually at least, their goal is quite achievable as solar energy wattage production is growing globally at 30% per year. They might near get there by default, based on current growth rates for solar.
__________________
Tomorrows realities, emerge from today's dreams. Live the dream !
Cheers, 007
Quote:
Parabolic trough plants could yield capacity factors greater than 70%, competing directly with future baseload coal plants. NREL: TroughNet - Parabolic Trough Power Plant Market, Economic Assessment and Deployment
Green Instantaneous Energy ! Massive Electrical Storage ! Ultracapacitors Minutes Charging
Disclaimer. Interpret posts with discretion. Conduct research and investigations to satisfy your judgement.

Last edited by LMagic007; 21st-February-2008 at 02:48 PM.
Reply With Quote