View Single Post
  #1878 (permalink)  
Old 15th-August-2007, 02:19 PM
cbacba cbacba is online now
Forum Hermit
Points: 3,919, Level: 39 Points: 3,919, Level: 39 Points: 3,919, Level: 39
Activity: 76% Activity: 76% Activity: 76%
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,301
cbacba is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paradox
Quote:
Originally Posted by Windguy
I still believe you are posting too high for clouds, but an easy method is to separate all the GHG's percentages including clouds and work out the forcings from there. H2O in the atmosphere is a far greater absorber of infrared than clouds (about double).
What are clouds made of? I thought water and ice (h20 and h20) were the perpetrators of that phenomenon.
Evidently opaque supersaturated concentrations of h2o in clouds with 100% humidity and particulate sizes to 60mm (big hail) are obviously far less capable of blocking (reflecting and absorbing)radiant energy than mere wiffits of minor h2o concentrations. I wonder if he meant co2 rather than h2o. I also wonder if he ever looks at the satellite weather forecases that show the clouds, perhaps combined with the radar, you know, the IR images?
__________________
Scientists Question
Leaders Inspire Vision
Political Hacks Seek Consensus
Reply With Quote