View Single Post
  #1366 (permalink)  
Old 19th-April-2007, 04:49 AM
Skeptic Skeptic is offline
Eco Warrior
Points: 3,999, Level: 40 Points: 3,999, Level: 40 Points: 3,999, Level: 40
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 877
Skeptic is on a distinguished road
Default

Going back to solar influence.

Since 1976, greenhouse gas increase has correlated better with temperature increase than anything else. However, before that time, solar activity, as shown by the number and activity of sunspots, correlated better than GHGs.

http://web.dmi.dk/fsweb/solarterrest.../welcome.shtml

There are problems when trying to translate solar activity into calculated solar forcings. We still do not know exactly how sunspot activity actually drives warming or cooling. Theories exist, but tend to be controversial. Thus, organisations such as the IPCC who offer calculated solar forcings need to mention that such are extremely uncertain.

I mention this because the IPCC calculated solar forcings do not seem to correlate as well. However, sunspot activity correlation is extremely good, as shown in my reference.
__________________
Science, not dogma!
Reply With Quote