Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wardengineering
Coincidence of data of Sun and planets
The Sun has a solid core as does Earth. From the theories I have developed, the Earth solid core is still original rock from space. The implication is that the Sun core is the Same.
Since the Sun is mostly liquid there would be more active specific heat generated than active Latent Heat.
|
Theories you have developed? I thought you were a civil engineer. Are you an astrophysicist too? Dedicated amateurs developed theories in the eighteenth century, but things have gotten a bit more complex since then.
The sun is a plasma. Some researchers suspect that it's a liquid plasma but the standard model for the sun is still that it's a gas.
http://solar.physics.montana.edu/YPO...Structure.html
I'm not sure what you mean by the generation of specific heat vs latent heat. Latent heat only comes into play with change of phase, so unless the sun is evaporating or condensing it means nothing. Specific heat refers to the energy involved in temperature change, so it has no bearing on solar energy except to the extent that the sun's temperature is changing. I suppose you could say that specific heat is "generated"' when an object cools, and latent heat is "generated" when a gas condenses, but it's not the normal terminology.
How you got the impression that the sun has a rocky core is beyond me. The core of the sun is a fusion furnace, too hot for atomic structure to exist, never mind mineral compounds.
This is why scientists go to university.
I don't want to minimize the excellent work done by the many amateur scientists of the world. They collect data from streams, search for young supernovae in other galaxies, count birds at the feeder - - they collect data and send it to real scientists for analysis. I just have no patience with the so-called self-taught scientists who have it reversed: the scientists collecting the data and the untrained amateur doing the analysis.