Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MarkuisMellvile
I'm sure the number of members who follow the Real Climate link each time it is posted, goes down with time.
I've not clicked on it yet, as I'm fairly confident of my knowledge of the statistics and treends associated with climatic modelling. The UKCIP02 scenarios are described in detail in the brochures/journals I have at home.
MM
|
MM. Why don't you tell us about these journals. When were they published? Are they up to date? Where can these journals be found? Is there a link to them on the internet? What side do they represent? Most of all, do they portray all key points clearly and accurately? They are all very relevant questions. Please do tell us. I must say though; that every single journal is usually written by one single author, and they do represent only one point of view. All the evidence in such journals most likely provide proof for only the points the author(s) is/are trying to make. Are these journal co-authored? Who are the authors and what credentials do they have? What points are they trying to make? Do tell us.
I suggest, people get their information from a wide range of sources. All points of view need to be examined and disected to see what it's really worth. I don't think it's a good idea to stick to only one source. It only leads to a narrow point of view. Do cast a larger net so you can gather as big a cluster of information as you possible can. Once you have done that, you can formulate your opinion based on 'all' the information available to you. Don't fall into the trap of allowing yourself only one source. That is a very weak approach. It leaves people extremely biased and lacking in information. Not very scientific, now is it?
Now back to the original point. Let's try not to dodge the real issue at hand.
The point is, things are looking to be very bad and there is no denying that. The evidence is simply stockpiling, and it's getting impossible to cover it up any more. Even the Harvard professor, from the BBC article above, is stating the obvious as well. Yet there is still a pocket of resistance. Much of the resistance finds it's way to this site to make their last stance. They are fighting a loosing battle. There is too much evidence stacked against them. It may seem like they are in great numbers, however they are merely struggling to keep their message alive.
The sceptics have very little ground to walk on. Any statement they make make are starting to fall on deaf ears. It's time everyone face the music.
ZPJ